Which of These Should be Banned in Public
A Very Warm Welcome.


 
Affiliates


Affiliates at a Glance

(Replaces the Marquee)

Latest Activity

Inaine daily personal tweeting. To follow my more serious tweets go to
@SandyYatesUK
Whatcha Up To?

This Week’s Video
Facts
Scientists say that a star goes super nova in our galaxy roughly every 26 years. They can see how many have gone super nova by the remnants left. They have counted the past super novas and have found there have been approximately 250 in the life of our galaxy. 26 years x 250 = 6,500 years - This is the approximate age of the Earth as written in the Bible.

Share | 
 

 Which of These Should be Banned in Public

View previous topic View next topic Go down 

Which of These do You Feel Should be Banned in Public
 Hijab
 Niqab
 Burka
 Al-Amira
 Shayla
 Khimar
 Chador
 None
View results
AuthorMessage
Zandranna
Owner
Owner
avatar

Name : Sandy
Location : Dorset
UK
Posts : 1094
Kudos : 76
Mood : Content
Birthday : 1st Nov
Scorpio Rat

PostSubject: Which of These Should be Banned in Public   16/05/17, 11:21 am

Which of these do you feel should be banned in public places.  This is a multiple choice poll.  Tick as many as you feel the need to.  If you want to change your vote at any point then click to cancel it and vote again.













Back to top Go down
View user profile https://twitter.com/zandranna http://www.zandranna.com/u1wall Online
Zandranna
Owner
Owner
avatar

Name : Sandy
Location : Dorset
UK
Posts : 1094
Kudos : 76
Mood : Content
Birthday : 1st Nov
Scorpio Rat

PostSubject: Re: Which of These Should be Banned in Public   16/05/17, 11:31 am

I am a great believer in the rights of all to choose how to dress, but I also believe in the right of one law for all.

In the UK it is illegal to wear one's face covered by crash helmets, balaclavas and such and yet the covering of the face by Muslim women doesn't come under that law.

The trouble is that in some places even the wearing of the simple scarf would be wrong, such as hospitals, police, fire and ambulance services and such.  In fact anything that requires a uniform such as the armed forces and even some civilian jobs.  Common place jobs where food is handled such as cooks and chefs for instance.

Personally I believe that anything that covers the face should be completely illegal, and that each employer should have the right, without the non-sense of a court case to be able to state when employing anyone whether or not they are allowed to wear any form of head dress, cultural or religious items.

_____________________________________

Frank Ocean wrote:
Don't get my personality and my attitude confused.  My personality is me.
My attitude depends on you.

Back to top Go down
View user profile https://twitter.com/zandranna http://www.zandranna.com/u1wall Online
Sally
Topaz Member
Topaz Member
avatar

US
Posts : 111
Kudos : 12
Pisces

PostSubject: Re: Which of These Should be Banned in Public   16/05/17, 07:48 pm

Each to their own. In their country or community.
When you work then I believe in the appropriate dress for that job.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Zandranna
Owner
Owner
avatar

Name : Sandy
Location : Dorset
UK
Posts : 1094
Kudos : 76
Mood : Content
Birthday : 1st Nov
Scorpio Rat

PostSubject: Re: Which of These Should be Banned in Public   16/05/17, 08:48 pm

I actually like the hijab as an accessory.  And if I were a young woman now I would actually wear one as an accessory.

I can also understand women, be they Jew, Christian or Muslim, wanting to wear one as a sign of their faith.  Even in the Bible it is said that a woman should cover her head when praying or prophesying, which is why that up until quite recently women always wore hats or scarves in church.

What I do get annoyed at is that the employment figures of Muslim women in this country is very low which they are complaining about, but if they want to wear clothes totally unsuitable to the job why on earth do they expect people to employ them.

The other thing they winge about is that they are never invited into a Christian home (seemingly they think that white British are all Christian), and that Christians don't want to befriend them.  But then if they are refusing to intergrate properly how do they expect people to hold out the first hand of friendship.

The burka and niqab give the impression they are deliberately cutting themselves off from the rest of society and don't want to know us.

_____________________________________

Frank Ocean wrote:
Don't get my personality and my attitude confused.  My personality is me.
My attitude depends on you.

Back to top Go down
View user profile https://twitter.com/zandranna http://www.zandranna.com/u1wall Online
Spherical
Ruby Member
Ruby Member
avatar

Name : Martha
Location : Australia
AU
Posts : 539
Kudos : 105
Mood : Amused
Birthday : 3rd March
Pisces Ox

PostSubject: Re: Which of These Should be Banned in Public   16/05/17, 11:51 pm

Having a hearing problem I rely on other ways to gauge and see what someone is trying to converse with me and if I can't see their face, then that becomes a problem for me. And this is not even religiously related and I mean this in a general way.

The 2nd thing for me is that if I have to take of my helmet or scarf when I enter a bank or hospital etc; much the same as the UK; then those who cover their faces should be forced to do the same!
This in the name of security and verification purposes.

So having said the above; I voted for the Niqab and Burka

_____________________________________

Back to top Go down
View user profile http://spherical.forumotion.com http://sphericals.weebly.com
Zandranna
Owner
Owner
avatar

Name : Sandy
Location : Dorset
UK
Posts : 1094
Kudos : 76
Mood : Content
Birthday : 1st Nov
Scorpio Rat

PostSubject: Re: Which of These Should be Banned in Public   18/05/17, 02:35 pm

I think what we have to be careful of is how laws are slowly changing to suit Islamic beliefs.

There was a case recently in America.  I think it was California.  Where a Muslim women took her husband to court for beating her.

The judge sided with the husband because he beat her under Islamic law and therefore found innocent.

Good for the woman, because she took it back to court under appeal and the second judge obviously found the husband guilty.

Not many women do have the guts to prosecute their husbands, let alone a Muslim woman, and she was failed by the first judge simply because he didn't separate religion and state law which totally goes against the American constitution.

But you see how Islam is slowly creeping into western society simply because so many are now so far left and liberal and so adamant about political correctness, they simply refuse to see how Islam is not a religion of peace but a religion of war and conquering.

Already we have Sharia courts in the UK that deal with family matters and divorce.  Next they will be demanding that they are also allowed to deal with Muslim criminal cases.  In Canada, the US and the UK Islamists are already fighting to make blasphamy a criminal offence.  How long will it be before that happens?   I can see it coming.

I 100% believe in stopping this covering of the face because it's a tiny bit of the begining of something bigger yet to come.

Already in London because there is now a Muslim Mayor adverts are not allowed to be displayed of womens under clothes or holidays that show women in swimsuits.  Buses have adverts on advertising Islam, the peaceful religion.  Muslims are demanding that swimming pools don't allow mixed swimming.

They tried stopping everyone eating and drinking in parliament during ramadan a couple of years ago because it wasn't fair on the Muslims that had to fast.  Thank God that was thrown out.

What's next?  Rules to say women can't wear skirts in work that don't cover their legs. Or have to wear loose fitting tops, or high heels, in case they offend Muslims.

If their Mosques fill up too much, especially on a Friday which is their equivalent of the sabbath, they are allowed to spill out on the streets and pray with the police having to close off roads to allow this.

You check out the history of the Lebanese and how what was a Christian country in the 1970s took in Muslim refugees and within a few years 1000s of Lebanese Christians were slaughtered and displaced and Islam took over the country completely after a bloody civil war.

This isn't distance history, this is modern history.  Has no one learned any lessons from this?

Throughout history this is what Islam has done.  They have played the victim and become refugees only to conquer the countries that took them in within a few short years.  It was through Mohammad doing this in Mecca that they learned how.

I would suggest you watch the whole of this video but if you just want to listen to her own experiences of how her country was taken over by Muslims in the 70s then skip to 14.40 - Believe you me, you will want to know this.



If you are interested and want to hear an interview she gave then also view this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ku7eU6M21Ho&t=53s

_____________________________________

Frank Ocean wrote:
Don't get my personality and my attitude confused.  My personality is me.
My attitude depends on you.

Back to top Go down
View user profile https://twitter.com/zandranna http://www.zandranna.com/u1wall Online
Spherical
Ruby Member
Ruby Member
avatar

Name : Martha
Location : Australia
AU
Posts : 539
Kudos : 105
Mood : Amused
Birthday : 3rd March
Pisces Ox

PostSubject: Re: Which of These Should be Banned in Public   20/05/17, 12:00 am

I will come back to this later and watch it!

_____________________________________

Back to top Go down
View user profile http://spherical.forumotion.com http://sphericals.weebly.com
 
Which of These Should be Banned in Public
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Zan's Zone :: Now We're Buzzing - Members Only :: Coffee Break-
Jump to:  

Advertising Us & Our Websites


The Best of Top 100s